For acute liver failure (ALF), living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) may reduce waiting time and provide better timing compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). However, there are concerns that a partial graft would result in reduced survival of critically ill LDLT recipients and
Feasibility of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure
โ Scribed by Toru Ikegami; Akinobu Taketomi; Yuji Soejima; Yoshihiko Maehara
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 45 KB
- Volume
- 15
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1527-6465
- DOI
- 10.1002/lt.21684
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
We read with interest the article by Campsen et al. 1 describing the outcomes of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for acute liver failure (ALF) in the United States. They described 2 concerns in applying LDLT for ALF: appropriate donor evaluation during the rapid evolution of ALF and the outcome of the critically ill recipients receiving a partial graft. Because we have reported the largest adult-toadult LDLT series in the literature, 2 comments on their report with an update of our series are herein described.
Up to September 2007, 47 LDLTs (16%) were performed for ALF among 294 LDLTs at Kyushu University Hospital. Among them, 44 cases were adult-to-adult LDLTs for ALF, including16 males and 28 females, who ranged in age from 18 to 47 years (mean, 45 ฯฎ 12 years). The majority of the patients (n ฯญ 32, 73%) received left-lobe LDLT. Because the opportunity to perform deceased donor liver transplantation is almost not an option in Japan, possible donor candidates were transferred with an ALF patient to our center and underwent donor evaluation, including a history and physical, blood work, sonogram, and computed tomography volumetry, on the day of arrival. 2,3 There was no donor mortality in our series. Nonliver-associated complications occurred in 12 donors (23%), including peptic ulcer (n ฯญ 2), gastric stasis (n ฯญ 3), wound problem (n ฯญ 3), alopecia (n ฯญ 1), and temporary ulnar nerve palsy (n ฯญ 1). Liver-associated complications occurred in 5 donors (11%), including biliary problems (n ฯญ 3) and hyperbilirubinemia (n ฯญ 2). The donor complication rate in ALF (34%) was the same as that in patients with other indications (34%), and the evaluation process, carried out within a short period, did not cause any significant harm to the patients. 4 Despite such acceptable outcomes, we need to mention that a recent LDLT case for ALF turned out to have small-cell esophageal cancer, which was diagnosed by screening endoscopy 1 month after LDLT. The patient thereafter died of multiple systemic cancer dissemination 1 year after LDLT. The patient was a 61-year-old
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
The outcomes of patients with acute liver failure (ALF) vary greatly according to etiology. Emergency adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation (adult LDLT) would help address the shortage of available organs for patients with ALF, especially in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-endemic areas. We anal
The purpose of donor evaluation for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is to discover medical conditions that could increase the donor postoperative risk of complications and to determine whether the donor can yield a suitable graft for the recipient. We report the outcomes of
## Adult-to-Adult living Donor liver Transplantation Cohort Study (MALL) iver transplantation is now the standard of care for patients with end-stage liver disease. In 2002, more
The study objectives were to determine whether the findings of the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL) reflect the U.S. national experience and to define risk factors for patient mortality and graft loss in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). A2ALL previousl