The purpose of donor evaluation for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is to discover medical conditions that could increase the donor postoperative risk of complications and to determine whether the donor can yield a suitable graft for the recipient. We report the outcomes of
Living donor liver transplantation—Adult donor outcomes: A systematic review
✍ Scribed by Philippa F. Middleton; Michael Duffield; Stephen V. Lynch; Robert T.A. Padbury; Tony House; Peter Stanton; Deborah Verran; Guy Maddern
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 131 KB
- Volume
- 12
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1527-6465
- DOI
- 10.1002/lt.20663
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation, specifically donor outcomes. A systematic review, with searches of the literature up to January 2004, was undertaken. Two hundred and fourteen studies provided information on donor outcomes. The majority of these were case series studies, although there were also studies comparing living donor liver transplantation with deceased donor liver transplantation. Both underreporting and duplicate reporting is likely to have occurred, and so caution is required in interpretation of these results. Overall reported donor mortality was 12 to 13 in about 6,000 procedures (0.2%) (117 studies). Mortality for right lobe donors to adult recipients is estimated to be 2 to 8 out of 3,800 (0.23 to 0.5%). The donor morbidity rate ranged from 0% to 100% with a median of 16% (131 studies). Biliary complications and infections were the most commonly reported donor morbidities. Nearly all donors had returned to normal function by 3 to 6 months (18 studies). In conclusion, there are small, but real, risks for living liver donors. Due to the short history of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation, the long-term risks for donors are unknown.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
For acute liver failure (ALF), living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) may reduce waiting time and provide better timing compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). However, there are concerns that a partial graft would result in reduced survival of critically ill LDLT recipients and
The study objectives were to determine whether the findings of the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL) reflect the U.S. national experience and to define risk factors for patient mortality and graft loss in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). A2ALL previousl
We read with interest the article by Thuluvath and Yoo comparing graft and patient survival in adult living donor liver transplant recipients (LDLT) to deceased donor recipients. 1 Using data from 1988 -2001 from the United Network for Organ Sharing database, they found lower graft survival in the L
We read with interest the article by Thuluvath and Yoo comparing graft and patient survival in adult living donor liver transplant recipients (LDLT) to deceased donor recipients. 1 Using data from 1988 -2001 from the United Network for Organ Sharing database, they found lower graft survival in the L