✦ LIBER ✦

The practice of student and program assessment: Evolution through engagement

✍ Scribed by Donna L. Sundre

Book ID: 112007634
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1994
Weight: 254 KB
Volume: 6
Category: Article
ISSN: 1041-6099
DOI: 10.1002/au.3650060104

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Effectively involving faculty in the ass

Effectively involving faculty in the assessment of student engagement

✍ Thomas F. Nelson Laird; Robert Smallwood; Amanda Suniti Niskodé-Dossett; Amy K. 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons ⚖ 67 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract This chapter discusses four roles—source of data, audience, data analyst, and beneficiary of assessment knowledge—faculty can play in the assessment of student engagement on college and university campuses.

Patterns of inclusive education through

Patterns of inclusive education through the practice of student teachers

✍ Angelides, Panayiotis 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Taylor and Francis Group 🌐 English ⚖ 87 KB

The Effect of Engaging Prior Learning on

The Effect of Engaging Prior Learning on Student Attitudes toward Creationism and Evolution

✍ STEVEN D. VERHEY 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 University of California Press 🌐 English ⚖ 645 KB

Engaging students through new literacies

Engaging students through new literacies: the good, bad and curriculum of visual essays

✍ Janette Hughes; Sarah Tolley 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Informa UK (Taylor & Francis) 🌐 English ⚖ 186 KB

Multilevel modeling: Applications to res

Multilevel modeling: Applications to research on the assessment of student learning, engagement, and developmental outcomes

✍ Pu-Shih Daniel Chen; Kristina Cragg 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 John Wiley and Sons ⚖ 136 KB

The role of precollege data in assessing

The role of precollege data in assessing and understanding student engagement in college

✍ James S. Cole; Marianne Kennedy; Michael Ben-Avie 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons ⚖ 143 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Obtaining precollege student data, including attitudes, academic performance, past and expected engagement, and family and student characteristics, is important for institutions to gain a better understanding of the first‐year experience.