✦ LIBER ✦

The mediating role of affective commitment in the relation of the feedback environment to work outcomes

✍ Scribed by Christina Norris-Watts; Paul E. Levy

Book ID: 113765266
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2004
Tongue: English
Weight: 202 KB
Volume: 65
Category: Article
ISSN: 0001-8791
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2003.08.003

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Gratitude works: its impact and the medi

Gratitude works: its impact and the mediating role of affective commitment in driving positive outcomes

✍ Randle D. Raggio; Judith Anne Garretson Folse 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Sage Publications 🌐 English ⚖ 273 KB

The Mediating Role of Feedback Acceptanc

The Mediating Role of Feedback Acceptance in the Relationship between Feedback and Attitudinal and Performance Outcomes

✍ Frederik Anseel; Filip Lievens 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 133 KB

Balancing Work and Family: The Role of H

Balancing Work and Family: The Role of High-Commitment Environments

✍ Peter Berg; Arne L. Kalleberg; Eileen Appelbaum 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 173 KB

Effects of psychological contract breach

Effects of psychological contract breach on performance of IT employees: The mediating role of affective commitment

✍ Simon Lloyd D. Restubog; Prashant Bordia; Robert L. Tang 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 103 KB

Five-factor model of personality and org

Five-factor model of personality and organizational commitment: The mediating role of positive and negative affective states

✍ Alexandra Panaccio; Christian Vandenberghe 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 265 KB

Perceived organizational support and aff

Perceived organizational support and affective commitment: the mediating role of organization-based self-esteem in the context of job insecurity

✍ Jaewon Lee; Riccardo Peccei 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 219 KB

## Abstract Research on the relationship between perceived organizational support (POS) and affective organizational commitment (AC) has primarily adopted a social exchange perspective. In this study we considered complementary socio‐emotional explanations of the POS–AC relationship. We focused on