๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The influence of organizational rank and role on marketing professionals' ethical judgments

โœ Scribed by Ishmael P. Akaah


Publisher
Springer
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Weight
691 KB
Volume
15
Category
Article
ISSN
0167-4544

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The author examines empirically the extent to which marketing professionals of different organizational ranks (lower versus upper) and roles (executive versus research) differ in ethical judgments. For organizational rank, the results indicate that marketing professionals of lower organizational rank do not differ from those of upper organizational rank in ethical judgments. For organizational role, the results suggest that marketing professionals of executive role differ in an "overall" sense from marketing professionals of research role in ethical judgments. In general, marketing professionals of executive role reflect higher ethical judgments than those of research role.

Unlike earlier years when the thrust of marketing ethics studies was the identification of practices that pose ethical problems, the field now reflects a trend toward the examination of factors that underlie ethical/unethical behavior -motivated in part by emerging models of ethical decision making in organizations (e.g., B o m m e r et al.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Ethical ideologies: Efficient assessment
โœ Susan Bardi Kleiser; Eugene Sivadas; James J. Kellaris; Robert F. Dahlstrom ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 116 KB

## Abstract Individuals often differ with respect to their ethical judgments of marketing practices. Personal beliefs are presumably important sources of such differences. This article reports on the development and testing of an original, parsimonious measure of personal moral beliefs based on For

The influence of non-anonymity deriving
โœ Ishmael P. Akaah ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1990 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 742 KB

The study examines, in the context of Crawford's (1970) study items, the influence of non-anonymity deriving from feedback of research results on marketing professionals' research ethics judgements, particularly that of response patterns (social desirability of responses) and item omissions. The res