The Effects of ‘Playing Historian’ on Learning in History
✍ Scribed by JENNIFER WILEY; JAMES F. VOSS
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 661 KB
- Volume
- 10
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0888-4080
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The present study investigates conditions under which undergraduates may adopt a view of history more similar to that of historians and how learning and understanding may be affected under such conditions. Two manipulations, one of the reading material and the other of writing task, were introduced within the standard 'read-to-write' approach of history instruction. Undergraduates were either given a textbook chapter about Ireland between 1800 and 1850, or the same information in the form of separate sources. After reading the presented material they were instructed to write a history, a narrative or an argument regarding what produced the significant changes in Ireland's population between 1846 and 1850. It was expected that the separate source/argument writing condition would yield the most historianlike behaviour. Indeed, students in this condition learned the material as well as, or better than, students in any other condition, but had the best understanding of the material, especially of causal and explanatory relationships.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract To think like a historian, students must select and assess evidence that supports interpretations of the meaning of the past. Three historians focus on aspects of this task and pursue different approaches to teach their students to use evidence.
Twenty-five dyslexic school pupils aged between 11 years 6 months and 16 years 3 months were considered in relation to their achievements in learning French. These pupils were compared to a group of 25 non-dyslexic subjects of similar age, social background and French learning experience. Ten pupils