๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The concurrent validity of a new intelligence test: The kahn intelligence test (KIT)

โœ Scribed by Whatley Fenlon; Luciano L'Abate


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1976
Tongue
English
Weight
212 KB
Volume
13
Category
Article
ISSN
0033-3085

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Concurrent validity of the slosson intel
โœ Kenneth D. Stewart; Dorothy Z. Wood; William A. Gallman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1971 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 237 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views
Concurrent validity of the test of nonve
โœ Frederick A. Hadd ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1986 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 287 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## Results of the TONI, WISC-R, and WRAT were compared for a sample of 66 learning disabled children: 51 males (32 white, 19 black) and 15 females (9 white, 6 black) whose mean age was 9-5 (SD = 1-10). The mean score of the TONI was significantly different from the Performance IQ. Nonsignificant d

Long-term validity of the Slosson Intell
โœ Kenneth D. Stewart; Donald G. Myers ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1974 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 143 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

The mean I& score on the PTI was 85.7, SD 14.0, while the mean SB I& score was 88.6, SD 13.9. The correlation between the SB and the P T I was .79. The PTI subtest correlations with the SB I& ranged from .43 (Size and Number) to .73 (Information and Comprehension). A split-half reliability coefficie

The WAIS as a group test of intelligence
โœ Robert F. Eme; Ronald E. Walker ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1969 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 155 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views
Validation study of the kahn test of sym
โœ Eric C. Theiner; Larry K. Hill; William R. Latham; Wilbur D. Mc Carty ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1962 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 325 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

This study presents data on the performance of chronic undifferentiated schizophrenic patients on the Trail Making Test (TMT), and compares the performance of these subjects with that of the brain damaged and control subjects as presented in the TMT manual. The TMT did not differentiate between brai