✦ LIBER ✦

The challenge of religious pluralism: A reply to James Kraft

✍ Scribed by Stephen Phillips

Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Year: 2006
Tongue: English
Weight: 243 KB
Volume: 45
Category: Article
ISSN: 0038-1527
DOI: 10.1007/bf02782486

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Of porcupines and poodles—a joint challe

Of porcupines and poodles—a joint challenge to industry and the profession: reply to C. Chapple

✍ Paul Hilton 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 48 KB

The Value of Social Constructionism for

The Value of Social Constructionism for the Counseling Profession: A Reply to Hansen

✍ James Rudes; Jeffrey T. Guterman 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 American Counseling Association 🌐 English ⚖ 170 KB 👁 1 views

The authors reply to J. T. Hansen's (2005) call for the profession to revalue the inner subjective experiences (ISE) of clients. Hansen argued that social constructionism has influenced the decline of the counseling profession by obscuring its unique focus on ISE. The authors maintain that social co

Reply to “Comments on a comparison of AM

Reply to “Comments on a comparison of AM1 with the recently developed PM3 method”

✍ James J. P. Stewart 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 181 KB

Reply to ‘remarks on the paper by J. M.

Reply to ‘remarks on the paper by J. M. Nicholls and B. F. James, “The location of the ground focus line produced by a transonically accelerating aircraft”’

📂 Article 📅 1972 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 216 KB

Reply to Professor Scheiner's criticisms

Reply to Professor Scheiner's criticisms, in A. N. 3593, of certain observations of the nebula in orion made at the Lick Observatory

✍ James E. Keeler 📂 Article 📅 1899 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 106 KB 👁 2 views

Limitations of the Rorschach as a diagno

Limitations of the Rorschach as a diagnostic tool: A reply to Garfield (2000), Lerner (2000), and Weiner (2000)

✍ James M. Wood; Scott O. Lilienfeld; Howard N. Garb; M. Teresa Nezworski 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 51 KB 👁 3 views

In "The Rorschach Test in Clinical Diagnosis: A Critical Review, With a Backward Look at Garfield (1947)," we have shown that the Rorschach has little validity as a diagnostic tool. In the present piece, we respond to comments by Garfield (2000), Lerner (2000), andWeiner (2000). Until very recently,