## Abstract A reparameterized version (PM3) of AM1 has recently been reported and the results for several hundred molecules compared with those from AM1 itself. The comparison implied that PM3 represents a significant improvement over the earlier treatment. The apparently poor performance of AM1 is
✦ LIBER ✦
Reply to “Comments on a comparison of AM1 with the recently developed PM3 method”
✍ Scribed by James J. P. Stewart
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1990
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 181 KB
- Volume
- 11
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0192-8651
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Comments on a comparison of AM1 with the
✍
Michael J. S. Dewar; Eamonn F. Healy; Andrew J. Holder; Yate-Ching Yuan
📂
Article
📅
1990
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 197 KB
COMMENTS ON “USE OF THE ANALYTICAL AND N
✍
D.R. Avalos; H.A. Larrondo
📂
Article
📅
1997
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 94 KB
We find the title paper both useful and very interesting and we would like to congratulate the authors to their work [1]. On the other hand it is also the purpose of this letter to add some pertinent references which have been inadvertently omitted by the authors. Reference [2] deals with elastical
COMMENTS ON “AN EXACT SOLUTION FOR A SIM
✍
M. ARYANPOUR; M. GHORASHI
📂
Article
📅
1999
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 55 KB
Comparison of the Electronic Structures
✍
K. Neuvonen; F. Fueloep; H. Neuvonen; A. Koch; E. Kleinpeter; K. Pihlaja
📂
Article
📅
2003
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
⚖ 57 KB
Rejoinder to Fong (2011) and Lenk (2011)
✍
Joseph Pancras; Dipak K. Dey
📂
Article
📅
2011
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 37 KB
👁 1 views