𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Study of the in vivo and in vitro photosensitizing capabilities of uroporphyrin I compared to photofrin II

✍ Scribed by J. Stuart Nelson; Chung-Ho C. Sun; Dr. Michael W. Berns


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1986
Tongue
English
Weight
594 KB
Volume
6
Category
Article
ISSN
0196-8092

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The in vivo biological activity of uroporphyrin I has been studied by determining the amount of necrosis produced in murine tumors exposed to various total doses of light at 615 nm. Similarly, the in vitro photosensitizing activity of uroporphyrin I was examined by measuring the percentage of cells killed in a cell culture system.

Light doses used were 25400 J/cm2. Mice that received uroporphyrin I at 40 mg/kg had only minimal superficial necrosis upon histological examination at doses of 400 J/cm2 (615 nm). Those tumors that received 300 J/cm2 or less showed no histological evidence of necrosis. Mice that received hematoporphyrin derivative (Photofrin 11) at 10 mg/kg were completely necrotic at total doses of 100 J/cm2 (630 nm). PTK2 epithelial cells incubated with uroporphyrin I at either 40 pg/ml or 80 p/ml and 10 J/cm2 (615 nm) showed no apparent damage and had 100% cell survival. By contrast, those cells treated with hematoporphyrin derivative (Photofrin 11) at 25 p g / d and 10 Jlcm' (630 nm) exhibited 100% cell kill.

It is concluded that uroporphyrin I is a poor photosensitizer in both in vivo and in vitro systems compared to hematoporphyrin derivative (Photofrin 11).


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Photosensitizing efficacy of MTHPC-PDT c
✍ Ingrid P. J. van Geel; Hugo Oppelaar; Yvonne G. Oussoren; Martin A. Der Van Valk πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French βš– 727 KB

## Abstract The new photosensitizer, meso‐tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTPHC) was compared with Photofrin in the murine RIF1 tumour and in normal mouse skin. A range of mTHPC or Photofrin doses were given at intervals of 1 hr to 7 days before illumination. mTHPC‐PDT resulted in much higher tumour pho

In vitro photosensitization II. An elect
✍ Dr. W. Gregory Roberts; L.-H. L. Liaw; Michael W. Berns πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1989 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 870 KB

Primary sites of subcellular destruction with photofrin I1 (PfI I) and mono-L-aspartyl chlorin e6 (MACE) were determined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Potorous tridactylus (PTK2) cells were grown in Rose chambers and incubated for 24 hr with a sensitizer concentration sufficient to prov

In vitro and in vivo studies of new cati
✍ M. Peeva; M. Shopova; U. Michelsen; D. WΓΆhrle; G. Petrov; H. Diddens πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 395 KB

Four recently synthesized cationic zinc(II)-benzonaphthaporphyrazines 1–4 were studied in vitro and in vivo for their photodynamic therapy (PDT) effectivity. The photophysical measurements showed that in solution and in Cremophor micelles all examined compounds exhibit very high absorption intensity

Direct comparison of in-vitro and in-viv
✍ Angela Ferrario; Natalie Rucker; Stefan W. Ryter; Daniel R. Doiron; Dr. Charles πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1991 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 574 KB

A pulsed KTP pumped dye laser (25 kHz repetition rate and 470 nsec pulse width) has been compared to a continuous wave argon ion pumped dye laser as the source of 630 nm light during in-vitro and in-vivo Photofrin-I1 mediated photosensitization studies. Individual experiments documented the effectiv