𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Strategic voting and the borda method

✍ Scribed by William G. Ludwin


Publisher
Springer US
Year
1978
Tongue
English
Weight
255 KB
Volume
33
Category
Article
ISSN
0048-5829

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Borda and the maximum likelihood approac
✍ Michel Truchon πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 151 KB

It is shown that, for a suitably chosen probability function, the maximum likelihood rule for vote aggregation coincides with the Borda rule, thus, partially reconciling the Borda and the Condorcet methods.

Setting the record straight: A note on s
✍ Dan S. Felsenthal πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› Springer US 🌐 English βš– 482 KB

The purpose of this note is to correct some inaccuracies in the literature regarding sophisticated voting under Borda's method. It is shown that if a single candidate must be elected and voters vote sophisticatedly under Borda's method, then: (1) Contrary to both claims, a voter's undominated votin

The Pareto rule and strategic voting
✍ Ian MacIntyre πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1991 πŸ› Springer US 🌐 English βš– 840 KB

This paper uses a particular choice rule over sets of alternatives under the Pareto rule. Starting from the sincere situation every strategic misrevelation of preference is shown to be an improvement for all voters. The existence of an equilibrium under successive misrepresentations by sincere voter

Borda's voting paradox: Theoretical like
✍ Andrew M. Colman; Ian Pountney πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1978 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 503 KB

Voting procedures, which play a major role in the decision making subsystems of group and societal level systems, generate interesting paradoxes. Some have been intensively studied in recent years. The possibility that the alternative chosen by simple plurality voting may not be preferred to the def

Manipulation and strategic voting in the
✍ BjΓΈrn Erik Rasch πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1987 πŸ› Springer US 🌐 English βš– 990 KB

The Norwegian parliament uses a sequential voting procedure. After some general remarks on how the legislature can avoid strategic voting by choosing an appropriate voting order, and an exposition of the rules whereby the agenda is determined in this particular parliament, voting order manipulation