𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Speech Handicap Index in patients with oral and pharyngeal cancer: Better understanding of patients' complaints

✍ Scribed by Rico N. Rinkel; Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw; Ellen J. van Reij; Neil K. Aaronson; C. René Leemans


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
93 KB
Volume
30
Category
Article
ISSN
1043-3074

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Background

A Speech Handicap Index (SHI) questionnaire with 30 items on speech problems was developed and validated in 92 patients with cancer of the oral cavity or pharynx and 110 healthy subjects.

Methods

All subjects completed the SHI and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire–Head & Neck module (QLQ‐H&N35). Twenty‐nine patients completed the SHI twice to assess test–retest reliability.

Results

Factor analysis identified 2 well‐defined subscales, assessing speech function and psychosocial functioning related to speech. Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were high. Construct validity was evidenced by its ability to distinguish between patient subgroups formed on the basis of tumor grade. A cut‐off score of 6 points was defined to identify patients with speech problems.

Conclusions

Results of this initial psychometric study indicate that the SHI is a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing speech problems. Additional research is needed to evaluate responsiveness of the questionnaire to changes in speech‐related problems over time. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2008


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


First report on the reliability and vali
✍ Raghav C. Dwivedi; Suzanne St.Rose; Justin W. G. Roe; Edward Chisholm; Behrad El 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 107 KB

## Abstract ## Background Posttreatment speech problems are seen in nearly half of patients with head and neck cancer. Although there are many voice‐specific scales, surprisingly there is no speech‐specific questionnaire for English‐speaking patients with head and neck cancer. The aim of this stud

Quality of life after free-flap reconstr
✍ Mari Markkanen-Leppänen; Antti A. Mäkitie; Marja-Leena Haapanen; Erkki Suominen; 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 90 KB 👁 2 views

## Background: Our aim was to investigate quality of life and outcome after microvascular free-flap reconstruction after oncologic surgery. ## Methods: Forty-four patients with a large carcinoma in the oral cavity, oral pharynx, or hypopharynx underwent free-flap surgery with or without radiother

Effect of induction chemotherapy on spee
✍ Denise A. Barringer; Katherine A. Hutcheson; Erich M. Sturgis; Merrill S. Kies; 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 196 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Background. Swallowing physiology, diet, and patient‐reported outcomes were evaluated after induction chemotherapy for oral tongue cancer. ## Methods. Fifteen of 23 patients enrolled in a phase II clinical trial of induction chemotherapy followed by surgical resection for oral ton