## Abstract Nature utilizes various styles of architecture for DNA‐binding proteins to recognize diverse DNA sequences, a process facilitated by a complementary surface between protein and DNA. However, the extent and ways this ‘shape complementarity’ occurs at the protein–DNA interface have yet to
Shape complementarity at protein–protein interfaces
✍ Scribed by Raquel Norel; Shuo L. Lin; Haim J. Wolfson; Ruth Nussinov
- Publisher
- Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
- Year
- 1994
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 713 KB
- Volume
- 34
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0006-3525
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract We present a computational approach to protein‐protein docking based on surface shape complementarity (“ProBinder”). Within this docking approach, we implemented a new surface decomposition method that considers local shape features on the protein surface. This new surface shape decompo
Here we carry out an examination of shape complementarity as a criterion in proteinprotein docking and binding. Specifically, we examine the quality of shape complementarity as a critical determinant not only in the docking of 26 protein-protein ''bound'' complexed cases, but in particular, of 19 ''
## Abstract ChemInform is a weekly Abstracting Service, delivering concise information at a glance that was extracted from about 100 leading journals. To access a ChemInform Abstract of an article which was published elsewhere, please select a “Full Text” option. The original article is trackable v
## Abstract Water molecules at protein–protein interfaces contribute to the close packing of atoms and ensure complementarity between the protein surfaces, as well as mediating polar interactions. Therefore, modeling of interface water is of importance in understanding the structural basis of biomo