𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Protein-protein docking by shape-complementarity and property matching

✍ Scribed by Tim Geppert; Ewgenij Proschak; Gisbert Schneider

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
668 KB
Volume
31
Category
Article
ISSN
0192-8651

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

We present a computational approach to protein‐protein docking based on surface shape complementarity (“ProBinder”). Within this docking approach, we implemented a new surface decomposition method that considers local shape features on the protein surface. This new surface shape decomposition results in a deterministic representation of curvature features on the protein surface, such as “knobs,” “holes,” and “flats” together with their point normals. For the actual docking procedure, we used geometric hashing, which allows for the rapid, translation‐, and rotation‐free comparison of point coordinates. Candidate solutions were scored based on knowledge‐based potentials and steric criteria. The potentials included electrostatic complementarity, desolvation energy, amino acid contact preferences, and a van‐der‐Waals potential. We applied ProBinder to a diverse test set of 68 bound and 30 unbound test cases compiled from the Dockground database. Sixty‐four percent of the protein‐protein test complexes were ranked with an root mean square deviation (RMSD) < 5 Å to the target solution among the top 10 predictions for the bound data set. In 82% of the unbound samples, docking poses were ranked within the top ten solutions with an RMSD < 10 Å to the target solution. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2010

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Examination of shape complementarity in
Examination of shape complementarity in docking of Unbound proteins
✍ Raquel Norel; Donald Petrey; Haim J. Wolfson; Ruth Nussinov 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 280 KB

Here we carry out an examination of shape complementarity as a criterion in proteinprotein docking and binding. Specifically, we examine the quality of shape complementarity as a critical determinant not only in the docking of 26 protein-protein ''bound'' complexed cases, but in particular, of 19 ''

Directional shape complementarity at the
Directional shape complementarity at the protein–DNA interface
✍ Ching-Sheng Yeh; Fang-Ming Chen; Jaw-Yuan Wang; Tian-Lu Cheng; Ming-Jing Hwang; 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 344 KB

## Abstract Nature utilizes various styles of architecture for DNA‐binding proteins to recognize diverse DNA sequences, a process facilitated by a complementary surface between protein and DNA. However, the extent and ways this ‘shape complementarity’ occurs at the protein–DNA interface have yet to

A large decoy set of protein–protein com
A large decoy set of protein–protein complexes produced by flexible docking
✍ Guillaume Launay; Thomas Simonson 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 804 KB

## Abstract Computational methods are needed to help characterize the structure and function of protein–protein complexes. To develop and improve such methods, standard test problems are essential. One important test is to identify experimental structures from among large sets of decoys. Here, a fl

Conformational selection of protein kina
Conformational selection of protein kinase A revealed by flexible-ligand flexible-protein docking
✍ Zunnan Huang; Chung F. Wong 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 919 KB

## Abstract Protein kinases have high structural plasticity: their structure can change significantly, depending on what ligands are bound to them. Rigid‐protein docking methods are not capable of describing such effects. Here, we present a new flexible‐ligand flexible‐protein docking model in whic