𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A large decoy set of protein–protein complexes produced by flexible docking

✍ Scribed by Guillaume Launay; Thomas Simonson


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
804 KB
Volume
32
Category
Article
ISSN
0192-8651

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Computational methods are needed to help characterize the structure and function of protein–protein complexes. To develop and improve such methods, standard test problems are essential. One important test is to identify experimental structures from among large sets of decoys. Here, a flexible docking procedure was used to produce such a large ensemble of decoy complexes. In addition to their use for structure prediction, they can serve as a proxy for the nonspecific, protein–protein complexes that occur transiently in the cell, which are hard to characterize experimentally, yet biochemically important. For 202 homodimers and 41 heterodimers with known X‐ray structures, we produced an average of 1217 decoys each. The structures were characterized in detail. The decoys have rather large protein–protein interfaces, with at least 45 residue–residue contacts for every 100 contacts found in the experimental complex. They have limited intramonomer deformation and limited intermonomer steric conflicts. The decoys thoroughly sample each monomer's surface, with all the surface amino acids being part of at least one decoy interface. The decoys with the lowest intramonomer deformation were analyzed separately, as proxies for nonspecific protein–protein complexes. Their interfaces are less hydrophobic than the experimental ones, with an amino acid composition similar to the overall surface composition. They have a poorer shape complementarity and a weaker association energy, but are no more fragmented than the experimental interfaces, with 2.1 distinct patches of interacting residues on average, compared to 2.6 for the experimental interfaces. The decoys should be useful for testing and parameterizing docking methods and scoring functions; they are freely available as PDB files at http://biology.polytechnique.fr/decoys. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2010


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Conformational selection of protein kina
✍ Zunnan Huang; Chung F. Wong 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 919 KB

## Abstract Protein kinases have high structural plasticity: their structure can change significantly, depending on what ligands are bound to them. Rigid‐protein docking methods are not capable of describing such effects. Here, we present a new flexible‐ligand flexible‐protein docking model in whic

Evaluation of the performance of four mo
✍ Xun Li; Yan Li; Tiejun Cheng; Zhihai Liu; Renxiao Wang 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 858 KB

## Abstract Many molecular docking programs are available nowadays, and thus it is of great practical value to evaluate and compare their performance. We have conducted an extensive evaluation of four popular commercial molecular docking programs, including Glide, GOLD, LigandFit, and Surflex. Our

Observation of large subunit protein com
✍ Joseph A. Loo 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 431 KB

## Abstract Mass spectrometry with electrospray ionization and a magnetic sector instrument was used to detect multiply charged molecules for the non‐covalently bound dimeric subunit protein complexes of horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase (__M__~r~ ∼ 80 000) and the tetrameric complexes of yeast alc