๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Second-look laparotomy

โœ Scribed by James L Moore Jr.; James F. Barter


Book ID
104594235
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Weight
787 KB
Volume
10
Category
Article
ISSN
8756-0437

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The second-look laparotomy has become an important means of assessing therapy response in ovarian cancer patients. This procedure enables the gynecologic oncologist to diligently search for small volume persistent disease, which often escapes detection by less invasive means. Subsequent treatment, if required, may then be tailored to the initial biologic response to therapy. However. many patients with negative findings at second look will develop recurrent disease, dampening enthusiasm for the operation. Although controversial, this procedure remains the gold standard for the detection of disease status following chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. @ 1994 WiIey-Liss. Inc.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Second look laparotomy and ovarian cance
โœ Sean Kehoe ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1994 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 59 KB

I read with interest the report by Zorlu et al. that effects on quality of life need addressing. The assessment appeared in the April 1994 issue of the Journal of Surgi-of response to new therapeutic modalities remains one cal Oncology on the use of second look laparotomy (SLL) area where SLL could

Consolidative 32P after second-look lapa
โœ Kellie S. Condra; William M. Mendenhall; Linda S. Morgan; Robert B. Marcus Jr. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 115 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

We report our experience with consolidative 32 P after second-look laparotomy. Forty-three patients received consolidative 32 P after platinum-based chemotherapy and a negative (39 patients, 91%) or positive (4 patients) second-look laparotomy. Thirtyone patients (72%) initially had stage III (30 pa