## Abstract ## Background Conventional vascular interventional surgery (VIS) is manually performed under fluoroscopic guidance, requiring lead protection for the surgeons. A remote‐control vascular interventional surgery robot (VISR) which can remotely, safely and precisely perform VIS would have
Robotic vascular surgery, 150 cases
✍ Scribed by P. Štádler; L. Dvoracek; P. Vitasek; P. Matous
- Publisher
- Wiley (Robotic Publications)
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 250 KB
- Volume
- 6
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1478-5951
- DOI
- 10.1002/rcs.344
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Background
Based on their experience of 150 robot‐assisted vascular reconstructions, the authors not only reflect on the current uses of the da Vinci robotic system in vascular surgery, but also discuss options for the further expansion of this cutting‐edge technology in their area of expertise.
Methods
To date there has not been the same level of development in laparoscopy in vascular surgery as in general surgery and, despite the numbers of published studies showing interesting results, laparoscopic vascular surgery has never been generally accepted. Robot‐assisted surgery represents a new stage of progress in mini‐invasive methods. During the period November 2005–September 2009, the authors performed 150 robot‐assisted vascular reconstructions in the aortoiliac area. The most significant include aortofemoral reconstructions and surgery on aneurysms of the abdominal aorta, the pelvic arteries and the splenic artery, as well as their first attempts to perform hybrid interventions.
Results
Four cases (2.7%) required conversion to standard surgery and four patients (2.7%) experienced more serious postoperative complications. On one occasion (0.7%) the robotic equipment broke down during the operation and surgery had to be completed laparoscopically. In one case (0.7%) the operation had to be abandoned because the finding on the aorta proved to be inoperable. In the cohort under consideration, the median operating time was 228 min, the median time taken to suture the anastomosis was 27 min and the median clamp time was 39 min.
Conclusions
Robotic operating systems improve the precision, control and dexterity of the surgical procedure and offer patients a higher quality of operating interventions. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Background Obtaining the expertise to perform minimally vascular interventional surgery (VIS) requires thorough training. Previous VIS simulators have generally assumed that blood vessels are rigid. However, vascular deformation occurs unavoidably in VIS. In this study, the arterial
## Abstract ## Background Remote‐controlled catheter navigation systems have recently been introduced into minimally invasive vascular surgery and some of them have already been applied in clinical practice. Steerable catheters with improved manoeuvrability play an important role in these innovati
## Abstract ## Objective To compare the surgical and pathological outcomes of patients with right‐sided colon cancers operated on by means of open and robotic surgery with extracorporeal anastomosis. ## Methods Thirty‐three consecutive patients who underwent robotic right hemicolectomy due to ri
Intra-aortic balloon pump entrapment is a rare complication that may necessitate major abdominal surgery that is potentially life threatening in the critically ill patients who require balloon counterpulsation. We report successful removal of a ruptured and entrapped intra-aortic balloon pump cathet