𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Risk of MDM2 SNP309 alone or in combination with the p53 codon 72 polymorphism in acute myeloid leukemia

✍ Scribed by Xiujuan Xiong; Min Wang; Lin Wang; Jiazhuo Liu; Xin Zhao; Zheng Tian; Jianxiang Wang


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
160 KB
Volume
33
Category
Article
ISSN
0145-2126

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the promoter of MDM2 gene, SNP309 T>G (a T-G exchange at nucleotide 309 in the first intron), can increase the expression level of MDM2, thereby causing an impairment of p53 tumor suppressor activity. A G-C exchange at p53 codon 72 polymorphism results in a substitution of proline (Pro) for arginine (Arg) in the transactivation domain, which was shown to alter the primary structure of the p53 protein. Both polymorphisms have been implicated in cancer. To investigate whether that MDM2 SNP309 and p53 codon 72 polymorphism should be at least partially responsible for genetic susceptibility to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), both polymorphisms were determined in a case-control study consisting of 231 AML patients and 128 normal individuals. The MDM2 SNP309G allele was associated with increased risk of AML. Furthermore, the p53 codon 72 and MDM2 SNP309 polymorphisms did not associate with age of onset and any other clinical parameters studied. When the p53 and MDM2 polymorphisms were combined, no multiplicative joint effect between the MDM2 GG and p53 Pro/Pro genotypes exists in the risk of developing AML. These results suggest that the MDM2 SNP309 homozygous GG genotype may be a genetic susceptibility factor in the pathogenesis of AML.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


MDM2 SNP309 T>G alone or in combination
✍ Bente A. Talseth; Cliff Meldrum; Janina Suchy; Grzegroz Kurzawski; Jan Lubinski; πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French βš– 64 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Disease expression in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) cannot be readily explained by mutation site in the respective DNA mismatch repair genes associated with this disorder. One explanation is the role of modifying genes that can either promote or prevent disease devel