𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Reversal of reserpine-induced catalepsy by selective D1 and D2 dopamine agonists

✍ Scribed by C. Anthony Hubbard; Dr. Joel M. Trugman


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1993
Tongue
English
Weight
601 KB
Volume
8
Category
Article
ISSN
0885-3185

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

To gain insight into the antiparkinsonian effects of selective D1 and D2 dopamine receptor stimulation, we examined the ability of D1 (SKF 38393) and D2 (quinpirole) agonists to reverse catalepsy induced by the combined administration of reserpine and α‐methyl‐p‐tyrosine (AMPT) in rats. Catalepsy, the failure to correct an externally imposed posture, is a measure of akinesia and was assessed using the bar test. Rats injected with reserpine alone (2.5 mg/ kg i.p.) developed akinesia and ptosis within 60‐90 min. The D1 agonist SKF 38393 (30 mg/ kg i.v.) rapidly reversed ptosis and restored near‐normal mobility when administered 24 h after reserpine and AMPT; catalepsy was reversed for 90 min, after which the drug effect wore off. Quinpirole (1 mg/ kg i.v.) reversed catalepsy for the duration of the test period (4 h) but did not consistently reverse ptosis or promote normal mobility; the rats continued to exhibit kyphotic postures with little spontaneous locomotion. These results indicate that selective D1 stimulation is sufficient to reverse reserpine‐induced akinesia and highlight the need for the development of potent selective D1 agonists for clincal traial in Parkinson's disease. In serve dopamine depletion, D2 stimulation alone appears to be insufficient to restore normal movement. Quinpirole, but not SKF 38393, elicited paroxysmal limb/ body jerking in reserpine‐AMPT‐treated rats, providing further evidence that atypical jerking can be elicited by D2 stimulation in the complete absence of D1 stimulation. This laboratory observation suggests that some jerking dyskinesias seen in treated parkinsonian patients may be mediated by an imbalance in D1‐D2 receptor stimulation.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Selectivity of agonists and antagonists
✍ Dr. Philip Seeman; Dimitri E. Grigoriadis; Hyman B. Niznik πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1986 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 332 KB

Seeman, P., D.E. Grigoriadis, and H.B. Niznik: Selectivity of agonists and antagonists at D2 dopamine receptors compared to D, and S2 receptors. Drug Dev. Res. 9:63-69, ## 1986. The common dopamine agonists (dopamine, apomorphine, ADTN, and N-propylnorapomorphine) are not selective for either D,

Effects of selective D-1 and D-2 dopamin
✍ Hiroshi Ujike; Taichi Onoue; Kazufumi Akiyama; Takashi Hamamura; Saburo Otsuki πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1989 πŸ› Springer 🌐 English βš– 481 KB

The present study examined effects of selective antagonists of D-1 and D-2 dopamine receptors on the development of behavioral sensitization produced by repeated methamphetamine (MAP) administration. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups. Each group received a daily injection of sal