✦ LIBER ✦

Response to Mr. Bill powers comments

✍ Scribed by H.P. Garg

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1984
Tongue: English
Weight: 56 KB
Volume: 32
Category: Article
ISSN: 0038-092X
DOI: 10.1016/0038-092x(84)90152-x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Editorial response to Bill Keepin

✍ Jae Edmonds 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 232 KB

76RL001830 for the Carbon Dioxide Research Division. The author gratefully acknowledges that support, but is solely responsible for all opinions expressed herein. The author would also like to express appreciation to Bill Chandler for his insights and helpful comments in review of this document.

Response to editorial comments

✍ McLeod, David G. 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 83 KB 👁 1 views

Response to Rankin's comments

✍ Gaalen L. Erickson; Jazlin V. Ebenezer 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 16 KB 👁 1 views

Rankin's comments on our article, "Chemistry Students' Conceptions of Solubility: A Phenomenography," are organized around three very different concerns which he has described in somewhat succinct and, we might add, provocative subheadings of: "Nothing New," Two Different Perspectives of Conceptions

Response to Shafer’s comments

✍ Kevin S. Van Horn 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 147 KB

I'd like to thank Professor Shafer for the historical background and additional perspective he has provided. I have only a few comments in response. I will proceed from less to more substantive issues. 1. Use of the word ''plausibility''

A response to the comments

✍ Harold L. Somers 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 612 KB

Reply to Mr. Heydorn's comment

✍ F. Bensch; H. Lederman 📂 Article 📅 1970 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 126 KB