✦ LIBER ✦

Reply to Mr. Heydorn's comment

✍ Scribed by F. Bensch; H. Lederman

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1970
Weight: 126 KB
Volume: 78
Category: Article
ISSN: 0029-554X
DOI: 10.1016/0029-554x(70)90447-7

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A further reply to Mr. Choong's comments

✍ Pinghai Shao; Robert Y. Huang 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 71 KB

Reply to Żukowski's comment

✍ Lucien Hardy 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 130 KB

Reply to Ledyard's comment

📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 95 KB

I can readily endorse Ledyard's view that in Theorem 1 "we rediscover that if candidates are certain about voters' preferences ... then no equilibrium exists." Indeed, I am quite happy to do so --since the purpose of that theorem was to capture (in a fully specified model) the "conventional wisdom"

Reply to Slutsky's comment

📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 107 KB

Reply to Edward's comment

✍ C. F. Barenghi; R. J. Donnelly; R. N. Hills 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 70 KB

Reply to Kovasov's comments

✍ Abou El-Makarim Aboueissa 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 56 KB 👁 1 views

Aboueissa and Stoline (2004) introduced a new computer algorithm for obtaining the Cohen's (1959) maximum likelihood estimates of m and s which does not require auxiliary tables. Closed form estimates of the mean and standard deviation obtained under a new replacement method were given for normally