𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Response to Shafer’s comments

✍ Scribed by Kevin S. Van Horn

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
147 KB
Volume
35
Category
Article
ISSN
0888-613X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

I'd like to thank Professor Shafer for the historical background and additional perspective he has provided. I have only a few comments in response. I will proceed from less to more substantive issues.

  1. Use of the word ''plausibility''

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Response to Rankin's comments
Response to Rankin's comments
✍ Gaalen L. Erickson; Jazlin V. Ebenezer 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 16 KB 👁 1 views

Rankin's comments on our article, "Chemistry Students' Conceptions of Solubility: A Phenomenography," are organized around three very different concerns which he has described in somewhat succinct and, we might add, provocative subheadings of: "Nothing New," Two Different Perspectives of Conceptions

Response to Dr. Oleson's comments
Response to Dr. Oleson's comments
✍ Daniel S. Kapp; Todd A. Barnett; Richard S. Cox; Eric R. Lee; Allen Lohrbach; Pe 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 141 KB
Response to Wolpoff's Comment
Response to Wolpoff's Comment
✍ Charles A. Lockwood; John G. Fleagle 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 36 KB 👁 1 views
Response to Morgan's comment
Response to Morgan's comment
✍ M. Hirano; M. Aniya 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 44 KB
Response to Chen's comment
Response to Chen's comment
✍ Robert W. Finkel 📂 Article 📅 1973 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 83 KB