✦ LIBER ✦

Response to Mallinckrodt's and Rowland's comments

✍ Scribed by Nelson, Avi

Book ID: 120979656
Publisher: Institute of Physics
Year: 2004
Tongue: English
Weight: 75 KB
Volume: 25
Category: Article
ISSN: 0143-0807
DOI: 10.1088/0143-0807/25/5/L03

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Response to Wilson's Comments

✍ Allen Grimshaw 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 191 KB

Response to Shafer’s comments

✍ Kevin S. Van Horn 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 147 KB

I'd like to thank Professor Shafer for the historical background and additional perspective he has provided. I have only a few comments in response. I will proceed from less to more substantive issues. 1. Use of the word ''plausibility''

Response to Rankin's comments

✍ Gaalen L. Erickson; Jazlin V. Ebenezer 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 16 KB 👁 1 views

Rankin's comments on our article, "Chemistry Students' Conceptions of Solubility: A Phenomenography," are organized around three very different concerns which he has described in somewhat succinct and, we might add, provocative subheadings of: "Nothing New," Two Different Perspectives of Conceptions

Kehoe’s Response to Comments

✍ Alice B. Kehoe 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 109 KB

Response to Pachter and Song's comments

✍ Coisne, Caroline; Dehouck, Bénédicte 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Nature Publishing Group 🌐 English ⚖ 53 KB

Response to Ulla Connor's comments

✍ Ryuko Kubota; Al Lehner 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 86 KB