✦ LIBER ✦

Response to Pachter and Song's comments

✍ Scribed by Coisne, Caroline; Dehouck, Bénédicte

Book ID: 109885959
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Year: 2005
Tongue: English
Weight: 53 KB
Volume: 85
Category: Article
ISSN: 0023-6837
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.3700334

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Response to Rankin's comments

✍ Gaalen L. Erickson; Jazlin V. Ebenezer 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 16 KB 👁 1 views

Rankin's comments on our article, "Chemistry Students' Conceptions of Solubility: A Phenomenography," are organized around three very different concerns which he has described in somewhat succinct and, we might add, provocative subheadings of: "Nothing New," Two Different Perspectives of Conceptions

Response to Shafer’s comments

✍ Kevin S. Van Horn 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 147 KB

I'd like to thank Professor Shafer for the historical background and additional perspective he has provided. I have only a few comments in response. I will proceed from less to more substantive issues. 1. Use of the word ''plausibility''

Kehoe’s Response to Comments

✍ Alice B. Kehoe 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 109 KB

Response to Dr Knott's comments

✍ R. N. Sawhney 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 114 KB

Response to Dr Frazier's comments

✍ Harold Zirin 📂 Article 📅 1972 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 191 KB

Frazier (1972) criticized the conclusions of Veeder and Zirin (1970) and of Foukal (1971) on the relation of chromospheric morphology to magnetic fields. No sooner was this answered by Foukal and myself (Foukal and Zirin, 1972) when a second, more strident criticism by Frazier (directly preceding

Response to Dr. Oleson's comments

✍ Daniel S. Kapp; Todd A. Barnett; Richard S. Cox; Eric R. Lee; Allen Lohrbach; Pe 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 141 KB