Response to Drs. Scott and Miller

In response to Drs. Byhardt and Scott

✍ Saarland University Medical Center; U Nestle; C Nieder; U Abel 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 33 KB

Response to Dr. Miller's letter

✍ Laura E. Crowley 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 33 KB

RESPONSE LETTER TO DRS. WANG AND BUTTERI

✍ Eric Howell; Steven Kravet; Scott Wright 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 37 KB

Response to drs. churg and green

✍ Thomas Mancuso 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 402 KB

Drs. Churg and Green [ 19891 in their Letter to the Editor evidently did not have available the previously published letters that made essentially the same points and my published response to each. To avoid duplication, I should like to cite the publication and pages where the replies have been made

Response to Drs. Cohen and Gorlin

✍ Norman, A. M. ;Donnai, D. 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 147 KB

Response to Drs. Westerink and Alberts

✍ Rate, William R. ;D'Angio, Giulio J. 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 44 KB

## Letter to the Editor: Response to Drs. Westerink and Alberts During the course of this study, the final target volume remained constant, specifically the ipsilateral flank and entire width of the vertebral body. The field size variations appeared to be related to the median age of the child at