✦ LIBER ✦

Response to drs. churg and green

✍ Scribed by Thomas Mancuso

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1990
Tongue: English
Weight: 402 KB
Volume: 17
Category: Article
ISSN: 0271-3586
DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700170411

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

Drs. Churg and Green [ 19891 in their Letter to the Editor evidently did not have available the previously published letters that made essentially the same points and my published response to each. To avoid duplication, I should like to cite the publication and pages where the replies have been made, and to respond further to the specific statements made by Churg and Green. To facilitate matters, certain replies will be restated.

Churg and Green referred to the nature of the exposure to chrysotile and possibly other forms of asbestos and to the analysis of asbestos samples. The reply to each aspect is presented in the response to Ohlson [1989] (pp. 353, 354), as well as in the Mancuso [1988] article itself (pp. 640, 641).

Churg and Green referred to the use of amphiboles in railroads in other countries, etc. The reply is also found in response to Ohlson [I9891 (p. 354).

Churg and Green referred to lung analysis and other forms of asbestos. The response to the same points by Ohlson [1989] (p. 355

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Response to Drs. Cohen and Gorlin

✍ Norman, A. M. ;Donnai, D. 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 147 KB

Response to Drs. Westerink and Alberts

✍ Rate, William R. ;D'Angio, Giulio J. 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 44 KB

## Letter to the Editor: Response to Drs. Westerink and Alberts During the course of this study, the final target volume remained constant, specifically the ipsilateral flank and entire width of the vertebral body. The field size variations appeared to be related to the median age of the child at

Response to Drs. Pritchard and Pinkerton

✍ Willoughby, M. L. N. 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 71 KB

We have read the comments of Drs. Pritchard and Pinkerton from Great Ormond St. (GOS), London, United Kingdom [ 11. The major amendment to our original presentation is that our patient is now close to 5-years from diagnosis (July 21st 1983) and has a plasma creatinine level of 40 umol/L. ''CR EDTA G

Response to Drs. Hegde, Leung, and Robso

Response to Drs. Hegde, Leung, and Robson

✍ Pauli, Richard M. ;Luebke, Heidi 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 87 KB

We appreciate the comments of Hegde et al. and this

Response to Drs. Sutherland, Callen, and

Response to Drs. Sutherland, Callen, and Gardner

✍ Pettenati, Mark J. ;Rao, P. Nagesh 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 191 KB

Response to Drs. Kitsugi, Kokubo, Yamamu

Response to Drs. Kitsugi, Kokubo, Yamamuro, and Nakamuro

✍ Alan Boyde 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English ⚖ 21 KB

## Response to Drs. Kitsugi, Kokubo, Yamamuro, and We can only agree that "it is difficult to measure Nakamuro: the contact area between AW-GC and bone when the detaching test is used." A main purpose of our paper was to illustrate the advantages of confocal microscopy in assessing the contact in