✦ LIBER ✦

Response to Drs. Ruifrok and Van der Kogel

✍ Scribed by J.W. Hopewell; G.J.M.J. van den Aardweg

Book ID: 107964596
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1993
Tongue: English
Weight: 508 KB
Volume: 25
Category: Article
ISSN: 0360-3016
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90329-t

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

In reply to Yaes and Ruifrok and Van Der

In reply to Yaes and Ruifrok and Van Der Kogel

✍ G.J.M.J. Van Den Aardweg; A.P. Van Den Berg; Daniel den Hoed; J.W. Hopewell 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 454 KB

Response to DRS, Huang, Lin, and Schmidt

Response to DRS, Huang, Lin, and Schmidt-Ullrich

✍ Arnout C.C. Ruifrok; Kathryn A. Mason; Howard D. Thames 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 263 KB

Response to drs. churg and green

✍ Thomas Mancuso 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 402 KB

Drs. Churg and Green [ 19891 in their Letter to the Editor evidently did not have available the previously published letters that made essentially the same points and my published response to each. To avoid duplication, I should like to cite the publication and pages where the replies have been made

Response to Drs. Cohen and Gorlin

✍ Norman, A. M. ;Donnai, D. 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 147 KB

Response to Drs. Westerink and Alberts

✍ Rate, William R. ;D'Angio, Giulio J. 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 44 KB

## Letter to the Editor: Response to Drs. Westerink and Alberts During the course of this study, the final target volume remained constant, specifically the ipsilateral flank and entire width of the vertebral body. The field size variations appeared to be related to the median age of the child at

Response to Drs. Pritchard and Pinkerton

✍ Willoughby, M. L. N. 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 71 KB

We have read the comments of Drs. Pritchard and Pinkerton from Great Ormond St. (GOS), London, United Kingdom [ 11. The major amendment to our original presentation is that our patient is now close to 5-years from diagnosis (July 21st 1983) and has a plasma creatinine level of 40 umol/L. ''CR EDTA G