𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Reply to Rusch, Jungwirth, and Hilsdorf's second discussion of the paper “on the choice of creep function for standard recommendations on practical analysis of structures”

✍ Scribed by Zdeněk P. Bažant; ElMamoun Osman

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1977
Tongue
English
Weight
883 KB
Volume
7
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-8846

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Addendum to reply to Rusch Jungwirth and
Addendum to reply to Rusch Jungwirth and Hilsdorf's second discussion of the paper “On the choice of creep function for standard recommendations on practical analysis of structures”
✍ Zdeněk P. Bažant; ElMamoun Osman 📂 Article 📅 1978 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 92 KB

This addendum is published in response to a suggestion by Dr. K. Willam, Stuttgart, to whom the writers are obliged for poi~tlng out that the reference to Argyris, Pister, and Willam's report in the first section of preceding reply I was incomplete and could have been misinterpreted. In that report

Reply to Rüsch, Jungwirth, and Hilsdorf'
Reply to Rüsch, Jungwirth, and Hilsdorf's discussion of the paper “on the choice of creep function for standard recommendations on practical analysis of structures”
✍ Zdeněk P. Bažant; ElMamoun Osman 📂 Article 📅 1975 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 365 KB

The authors welcome the Discussion by H. Rusch et al., for it raises several important questions on which, unfortunately, no agreement has yet been reached by specialists in the field. ## Comparison of the Proposed C.E.B. Creep Function with Test Data Effect of Vertical Shifting The figure of the