The authors show quite clearly that the equation for the creepfunction proposed for CEB International Recommendations (see, e.g., Ref. 2) is not suitable to approximate experimental creep curves satisfactorily over the full range of ages at loading of interest.
✦ LIBER ✦
A discussion of the paper “On the choice of creep function for standard recommendations on practical analysis of structures”
✍ Scribed by H. Rüsch; D. Jungwirth; H.K. Hilsdorf
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1975
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 200 KB
- Volume
- 5
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-8846
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
A discussion of the paper “on the choice
✍
W. Haas
📂
Article
📅
1976
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 128 KB
Reply to Jordan and England's discussion
✍
Zdeněk P. Bažant; ElMamoun Osman
📂
Article
📅
1976
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 146 KB
Reply to Rüsch, Jungwirth, and Hilsdorf'
✍
Zdeněk P. Bažant; ElMamoun Osman
📂
Article
📅
1975
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 365 KB
The authors welcome the Discussion by H. Rusch et al., for it raises several important questions on which, unfortunately, no agreement has yet been reached by specialists in the field. ## Comparison of the Proposed C.E.B. Creep Function with Test Data Effect of Vertical Shifting The figure of the
Discussion of the paper “on the choice o
✍
I.J. Jordaan; G.L. England
📂
Article
📅
1976
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 105 KB
Reply to Rusch, Jungwirth, and Hilsdorf'
✍
Zdeněk P. Bažant; ElMamoun Osman
📂
Article
📅
1977
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 883 KB
Reply to Rüsch, Jungwirth and Hilsdorf's
✍
Z.P. Bažant; E.M. Osman; W. Haas
📂
Article
📅
1977
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 129 KB
In their second discussion, R~sch, Jungwirth and Bilsdorf make comments on my discussion a which cannot remain unanswered.