Discussion of the paper “on the choice of creep function for standard recommendations on practical analysis of structures” by Zdenek P. Bazant and ElMamoun Osman
✍ Scribed by I.J. Jordaan; G.L. England
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1976
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 105 KB
- Volume
- 6
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-8846
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The authors welcome the Discussion by H. Rusch et al., for it raises several important questions on which, unfortunately, no agreement has yet been reached by specialists in the field. ## Comparison of the Proposed C.E.B. Creep Function with Test Data Effect of Vertical Shifting The figure of the
This addendum is published in response to a suggestion by Dr. K. Willam, Stuttgart, to whom the writers are obliged for poi~tlng out that the reference to Argyris, Pister, and Willam's report in the first section of preceding reply I was incomplete and could have been misinterpreted. In that report
The authors show quite clearly that the equation for the creepfunction proposed for CEB International Recommendations (see, e.g., Ref. 2) is not suitable to approximate experimental creep curves satisfactorily over the full range of ages at loading of interest.