Relating cell proliferation to in vivo bone formation in porous Ca/P scaffolds
β Scribed by Steven M. van Gaalen; Joost D. de Bruijn; Clayton E. Wilson; Clemens A. van Blitterswijk; Abraham J. Verbout; Jacqueline Alblas; Wouter J. A. Dhert
- Book ID
- 102295827
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 367 KB
- Volume
- 92A
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1549-3296
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Most current methods for cell monitoring on 3D porous scaffolds involve endβstage investigation of scaffolds. Repeated measurements on scaffolds, without disturbing cell vitality and proliferation, are needed to relate in vitro to in vivo data. Alamar Blueβ’ was used for this purpose. Two different Ca/P scaffolds were studied, using rat BMSCs with three different seeding densities [2.5 Γ 10^4^ (SD1), 2.5 Γ 10^5^ (SD2), 2.5 Γ 10^6^ (SD3) cells]. Alamar Blueβ’ readings were done on days 1, 3, 5 and 7. After 7 days all 96 scaffolds (n = 16) were implanted in 16 mice for 4 weeks. Bone histomorphometry was performed. For both scaffolds, seeding efficiencies were highest with SD1 and SD2, cell proliferation was optimal in SD1, whereas SD3 resulted in an initial drop in vital cell number in the first 3 days. In vivo, upscaling from SD1 to SD2 lead to significantly more bone contact% in both scaffolds. Alamar Blueβ’ was shown to be a valuable tool in relating in vitro to in vivo data. Cell proliferation may differ depending on seeding density and scaffold type used. Seeding more cells may not necessarily result in more in vivo bone contact%. Β© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2010
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract This study determined the bone growth into pretreated poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) scaffolds implanted into a subcritical size, rabbit cranial defect. PPF scaffolds were constructed by using a photocrosslinkingβporogen leaching technique. These scaffolds were then either prewetted (PP
## Abstract We conducted an __in vivo__ experiment to evaluate the resorption rate of a calcium phosphate cement (CPC) with macropores larger than 100 ΞΌm, using the CPC called Biocement D (Merck Biomaterial, Darmstadt, Germany), which after setting only shows pores smaller than 1 ΞΌm. The gas bubble