## Abstract Science itself may or may not be ethically neutral, but its study and pursuit are not valueβfree.
Reasoning in science and ethics
β Scribed by Edward Walter
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1974
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 894 KB
- Volume
- 8
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-5363
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
What was striking about the papers presented was the degree of unity of the central concems addressed, and the influence that a Kantian perspective exercised on many of them. The conference suggested that a great deal of the debate about practical reason in the near future is likely to center on the
The challenge of ethical problem solving in the context of the information-science professions has fostered debate over whether a code of ethics might not provide a valuable guide to decision making in situations involving ethical conflicts. Sample issues and questions are presented with an aim tow
'You can only find out the rights and wrongs by Reasoning β never by being rude about your opponent's psychology.' For C. S. Lewis, reason and logic are the sensible way to approach faith and ethics. Much of the 20th century's ills are caused by ill-founded beliefs and opinions. Lewis's original app
There is a relatively simple argument which shows that science is not, in any important sense, value free. Further, if science is not value free, it may be that the values involved in science rest upon moral considerations. In this paper the author examines one argument for the claim that science es