๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Radiofrequency exposure and mammalian cell toxicity, genotoxicity, and transformation

โœ Scribed by Martin L. Meltz


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
160 KB
Volume
24
Category
Article
ISSN
0197-8462

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The published in vitro literature relevant to the issue of the possible induction of toxicity, genotoxicity, and transformation of mammalian cells due to radiofrequency field (RF) exposure is examined. In some instances, information about related in vivo studies is presented. The review is from the perspective of technical merit and also biological consistency, especially with regard to those publications reporting a positive effect. The weight of evidence available indicates that, for a variety of frequencies and modulations with both short and long exposure times, at exposure levels that do not (or in some instances do) heat the biological sample such that there is a measurable increase in temperature, RF exposure does not induce (a) DNA strand breaks, (b) chromosome aberrations, (c) sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs), (d) DNA repair synthesis, (e) phenotypic mutation, or (f) transformation (cancer-like changes). While there is limited experimental evidence that RF exposure induces micronuclei formation, there is abundant evidence that it does not. There is some evidence that RF exposure does not induce DNA excision repair, suggesting the absence of base damage. There is also evidence that RF exposure does not inhibit excision repair after the induction of thymine dimers by UVexposure, as well as evidence that indicates that RF is not a co-carcinogen or a tumor promoter. The article is in part a tutorial, so that the reader can consider similarities and discrepancies between reports of RF-induced effects relative to one another. Bioelectromagnetics Supplement 6:S196-S213, 2003.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Toxic and genotoxic action of electric-a
โœ R. S. U. Baker; A. Arlauskas; R. K. Tandon; P. T. Crisp; J. Ellis ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1986 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 547 KB

Welding fumes generated by manual metal arc welding (MMAW) with an automatic welding machine were extracted with water and both the soluble and insoluble fractions were investigated for mitotic delay and for sister chromatid exchange (SCE) induction in cultured Chinese hamster lung (Don) cells. Five

Fluchloralin is cytotoxic and genotoxic
โœ S. Sinha; N. Panneerselvam; G. Shanmugam ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 330 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

The genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of a widely used To understand the mechanism of cell death caused herbicide, fluchloralin, were assessed using cultured by fluchloralin, its effect on DNA synthesis and its mammalian cells. Treatment of cells for 8-12 hr with ability to induce apoptosis were inves

Mammalian cell transformation and aneupl
โœ Takeki Tsutsui; Yukiko Tamura; Ayako Suzuki; Yutaka Hirose; Morio Kobayashi; Hir ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ French โš– 75 KB

## Bisphenol-A (BP -A), a monomer of plastics used in numerous consumer products and a xenoestrogen, induces cellular transformation and aneuploidy in Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cells. In this study, the abilities of 4 other bisphenols to induce cellular transformation and genetic effects in SHE c

Cytotoxicity and negligible genotoxicity
โœ Dr. Joseph R. Landolph ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1985 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 843 KB

The cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of refined borax and borax ores were studied in cultured mammalian cells. In V79 Chinese hamster cells, C3H/lOTl/2 mouse embryo fibroblasts, and diploid human foreskin fibroblasts, crude borax ore, kernite ore, and refined borax were all cytotoxic. The lowest concen