๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Qualitative research and marketing mysteries: An introduction to the special issue

โœ Scribed by Ronald Jay Cohen


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
43 KB
Volume
16
Category
Article
ISSN
0742-6046

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Counterfactual thinking and marketing: I
โœ Neal J. Roese ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 26 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Counterfactuals are thoughts regarding alternatives to past outcomes, and they are an increasingly active topic of psychological research. Recently, this work has been applied to organizational and marketing domains. This introduction summarizes the theoretical basis underlying the effects of counte

Webometrics: An introduction to the spec
โœ Mike Thelwall; Liwen Vaughan ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 48 KB

## Abstract Webometrics, the quantitative study of Web phenomena, is a field encompassing contributions from information science, computer science, and statistical physics. Its methodology draws especially from bibliometrics. This special issue presents contributions that both push forward the fiel

Time and decision: introduction to the s
โœ Daniel Read; George Loewenstein ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 84 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

This special issue showcases cutting-edge contributions to the ยฎeld of intertemporal choice, which refers to tradeos between costs and beneยฎts occurring at dierent points in time. Although intertemporal choice is a central aspect of decision theory and decision research ร it is dicult to think of an

Introduction to the special issue: Edito
โœ Dan Schendel ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 15 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Each Associate Editor has written a commentary on the paper he has invited to present to us in this special issue. Each Associate Editor tells us something about the work selected. Because there are so many fine scholars working today, I know these were hard choices for each Associate Editor to make