𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Protein refolding in reversed micelles: Interactions of the protein with micelle components

✍ Scribed by Anna J. Hagen; T. Alan Hatton; Daniel I. C. Wang


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1990
Tongue
English
Weight
998 KB
Volume
35
Category
Article
ISSN
0006-3592

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


A novel process has been developed to improve the refolding yield of denatured proteins. It uses reversed micelles to isolate denatured protein molecules from each other and thus, upon refolding, reduces the intermolecular interactions which lead to aggregation. The feasibility of this process was first demonstrated with Ribonuclease A as a model protein. In the present work, we expanded the scope of this study t o better understand both the general mechanisms of protein refolding in reversed micelles and the biotechnological applicability of the process. First, we investigated the interactions between the individual components of the reversed micellar system (the protein molecule, the denaturant guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCI), and the surfactant (AOT)) during the refolding process. We then extended our studies to a more hydrophobic protein, y-interferon, which aggregates upon refolding in aqueous solution. However, it was also found to aggregate in our reversed micelle process during the extraction step. Since y-interferon is a much more hydrophobic protein than RNase, we hypothesize that interactions between hydrophobic amino acids and the surfactant layer may interfere with refolding. This hypothesis was tested by studying the refolding of chemically modified RNase. The substitution of 55% of the surface lysine residues with hydrophobic caproyl groups caused a significant decrease in the refolding yield of RNase in the reversed micellar system without affecting aqueous solution renaturation. In addition, the extraction efficiency of the enzyme from reversed micelles back into aqueous solution was severely reduced and resulted in aggregation. These experiments indicate that unfolded hydrophobic proteins interact with the surfactant molecules, which limits their ability to refold in reversed micelles.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Protein refolding in reversed micelles
✍ Anna J. Hagen; T. Alan Hatton; Daniel I.C. Wang πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 173 KB

## Abstract A novel process has been developed which uses reversed micelles to isolate denatured protein molecules from each other and allows them to refold individually. These reversed micelles are aqueous phase droplets stabilized by the surfactant AOT and suspended in iso‐octane. By adjusting co

Protein refolding in reversed micelles
✍ Anna J. Hagen; T. Alan Hatton; Daniel I. C. Wang πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1990 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 1016 KB
Mass transfer rate of protein extraction
✍ Matthijs Dekker; Klaas Van't Riet; Bert H. Bijsterbosch; Peter Fijneman; Riet Hi πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1990 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 961 KB

The rate of mass transfer in the liquid-liquid extraction of the enzyme Ix-amylase between an aqueous phase and a reversed micellar phase has been investigated.. Mass transfer rate coel%cients have been measured in a mixer/settler and in a stirred cell. The pH of the aqueous phase determines the dis

Chemically modified proteins solubilized
✍ G. Cassin; S. Illy; M.P. Pileni πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 735 KB

In previous papers it has been shown that solubibzation of native cytochrome c in sodium bis(2-ethyIbexyl) suIfosuccinate/ water/isooctane reverse miceIIes induces a percolation phenomenon in dilute micellar solution compared to empty miceIIes. This has been attributed to an increase in the interact