𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Progress in the pursuit of therapeutic adenosine receptor antagonists

✍ Scribed by Stefano Moro; Zhan-Guo Gao; Kenneth A. Jacobson; Giampiero Spalluto


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
570 KB
Volume
26
Category
Article
ISSN
0198-6325

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Ever since the discovery of the hypotensive and bradycardiac effects of adenosine, adenosine receptors continue to represent promising drug targets. First, this is due to the fact that the receptors are expressed in a large variety of tissues. In particular, the actions of adenosine (or methylxanthine antagonists) in the central nervous system, in the circulation, on immune cells, and on other tissues can be beneficial in certain disorders. Second, there exists a large number of ligands, which have been generated by introducing several modifications in the structure of the lead compounds (adenosine and methylxanthine), some of them highly specific. Four adenosine receptor subtypes (A~1~, A~2A~, A~2B~, and A~3~) have been cloned and pharmacologically characterized, all of which are G protein‐coupled receptors. Adenosine receptors can be distinguished according to their preferred mechanism of signal transduction: A~1~ and A~3~ receptors interact with pertussis toxin‐sensitive G proteins of the G~i~ and G~o~ family; the canonical signaling mechanism of the A~2A~ and of the A~2B~ receptors is stimulation of adenylyl cyclase via G~s~ proteins. In addition to the coupling to adenylyl cyclase, all four subtypes may positively couple to phospholipase C via different G protein subunits. The development of new ligands, in particular, potent and selective antagonists, for all subtypes of adenosine receptors has so far been directed by traditional medicinal chemistry. The availability of genetic information promises to facilitate understanding of the drug–receptor interaction leading to the rational design of a potentially therapeutically important class of drugs. Moreover, molecular modeling may further rationalize observed interactions between the receptors and their ligands. In this review, we will summarize the most relevant progress in developing new therapeutic adenosine receptor antagonists. Β© 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Recent developments in the field of A3 a
✍ Pier Giovanni Baraldi; Mojgan Aghazadeh Tabrizi; Francesca Fruttarolo; Andrea Bo πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 201 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract Adenosine is an endogenous modulator of a large variety of physiological functions through the interaction with specific cell membrane G‐protein‐coupled receptors classified as A~1~, A~2A~, A~2B~, and A~3~. Activation of A~3~ receptors has been shown to stimulate phospholipase C and to

Potent antagonists for the human adenosi
✍ Maarten de Zwart; Roel C. Vollinga; Margot W. Beukers; Danielle F. Sleegers; Jac πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 147 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

A series of novel and known 5-substituted 7-amino-2-(2-furyl) [1,2,4]triazolo [1,5a][1,3,5]triazine derivatives were synthesized and tested for adenosine receptor antagonism in radioligand binding assays at all four adenosine receptor subtypes and for inhibition of the agonist-induced cyclic AMP res

The adenosine receptor antagonist theoph
✍ W. Hauber; M. MΓΌnkle πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› Springer-Verlag 🌐 English βš– 890 KB

Previous work revealed that adenosine antagonists as theophylline reversed neuroleptic-induced catalepsy and potentiated anticataleptic effects of dopamine agonists reflecting specific adenosine-dopamine receptor interactions in the central nervous system. We tested whether similar functional intera