The following three comments and claims are made: 1. The 'approximate maximum likelihood method ' [called RELS in (S6derstr6m et al., 1978)] may work well in applications even though it has been proven that it does not always converge. 2. It was incorrect in (\* Ljung et al., 1975) to call the 'si
On the uniqueness of maximum likelihood identification
✍ Scribed by T Söderström
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1975
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 426 KB
- Volume
- 11
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0005-1098
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The maximum likelihood method of identification is a powerful tool for obtaining mathematical models of dynamic processes. To apply this method a loss function has to be minimized. The aim of the paper is an investigation of the local minimum points of this loss function for a common structure of a general form. If the loss function has more than one local minimum point, numerical problems can occur during the minimization. Sufficient conditions are given for the existence of a unique stationary point, which then also.gives the desired global minimum. It is also shown by counter-examples that there are systems without peculiarities, which have more than one local minimum point of the loss function.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The question of non-convergence of the approximate maximum likelihood identification algorithm is discussed. It is pointed out that although there are systems for which in theory the algorithm does not converge to any finite limit, the computer implementation always gives results which settle at con
The likelihood function for the bivariate survivor function F, under independent censorship, is maximized to obtain a non-parametric maximum likelihood estimator F K . F K may or may not be unique depending on the con"guration of singly-and doubly-censored pairs. The likelihood function can be maxim
Maximum likelihood estimator is obtained for the mortality rate function of a specific type appearing in survival data andysis. Strict consistency of this estimator is proved.