The following three comments and claims are made: 1. The 'approximate maximum likelihood method ' [called RELS in (S6derstr6m et al., 1978)] may work well in applications even though it has been proven that it does not always converge. 2. It was incorrect in (\* Ljung et al., 1975) to call the 'si
Non-convergence of the approximate maximum likelihood identification algorithm
β Scribed by V. Panuska
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1980
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 205 KB
- Volume
- 16
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0005-1098
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The question of non-convergence of the approximate maximum likelihood identification algorithm is discussed. It is pointed out that although there are systems for which in theory the algorithm does not converge to any finite limit, the computer implementation always gives results which settle at constant values for large data lengths due to the round-off effect in the digital number representation system. This is illustrated by the presented numerical results.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The maximum likelihood method of identification is a powerful tool for obtaining mathematical models of dynamic processes. To apply this method a loss function has to be minimized. The aim of the paper is an investigation of the local minimum points of this loss function for a common structure of a
The likelihood function for the bivariate survivor function F, under independent censorship, is maximized to obtain a non-parametric maximum likelihood estimator F K . F K may or may not be unique depending on the con"guration of singly-and doubly-censored pairs. The likelihood function can be maxim
This paper is concerned with investigation into the behavior of the likelihood ratio test statistic G2 when the alternative hypothesis M ( Q ) is the true model. Exact moments of G2 are computed empirically and three approximations are considered for approximating the non-null distribution of G2. Ou
Transmissions through multipath channels suffer from Rayleigh fading and intersymbol interference. This can be overcome by sending a (known) training sequence and identifying the channel (active identification). However, in a non-stationary context, the channel model has to be updated by periodicall