The following three comments and claims are made: 1. The 'approximate maximum likelihood method ' [called RELS in (S6derstr6m et al., 1978)] may work well in applications even though it has been proven that it does not always converge. 2. It was incorrect in (\* Ljung et al., 1975) to call the 'si
✦ LIBER ✦
Author's reply to comments on ‘non-convergence of the approximate maximum likelihood identification algorithm’
✍ Scribed by V. Panuska
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1980
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 57 KB
- Volume
- 16
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0005-1098
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Comments on ‘non-convergence of the appr
✍
Lennart Ljung
📂
Article
📅
1980
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 130 KB
Non-convergence of the approximate maxim
✍
V. Panuska
📂
Article
📅
1980
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 205 KB
The question of non-convergence of the approximate maximum likelihood identification algorithm is discussed. It is pointed out that although there are systems for which in theory the algorithm does not converge to any finite limit, the computer implementation always gives results which settle at con