✦ LIBER ✦

On the student evaluation of university courses and faculty members’ teaching performance

✍ Scribed by Nikolaidis, Yiannis; Dimitriadis, Sotirios G.

Book ID: 122234812
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2014
Tongue: English
Weight: 596 KB
Volume: 238
Category: Article
ISSN: 0377-2217
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.03.018

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Evaluation of Teaching || Summary of an

Evaluation of Teaching || Summary of an Analysis of Student Evaluations of Faculty and Courses

✍ Keith G. Lumsden 📂 Article 📅 1973 🏛 Heldref Publishing 🌐 English ⚖ 124 KB

Student Research Projects: The Experienc

Student Research Projects: The Experiences of Student Dietitians, University Faculty Members, and Collaborators

✍ Kevin Whelan; Jane E. Thomas; Angela M. Madden 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 101 KB

The Relationship Between Student Evaluat

The Relationship Between Student Evaluations of Teaching and Faculty Evaluations

✍ Read, William J.; Rama, Dasaratha V.; Raghunandan, K. 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Heldref Publishing 🌐 English ⚖ 471 KB

Management by results: Student evaluatio

Management by results: Student evaluation of faculty teaching and the mis-measurement of performance

✍ Laura Langbein 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 244 KB

Student evaluations of teaching: percept

Student evaluations of teaching: perceptions of faculty based on gender, position, and rank

✍ Kogan, Lori R.; Schoenfeld-Tacher, Regina; Hellyer, Peter W. 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Taylor and Francis Group 🌐 English ⚖ 217 KB

Bias and the intended use of student eva

Bias and the intended use of student evaluations of university faculty

✍ Katherine Lewellan Kasten; I. Phillip Young 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 509 KB

This study examines whether the intended use of data obtained from student evaluations of university faculty biases the ratings. The paper reviews and critiques previous research done in the area. Previous studies produced contradictory results, but the results were confounded by several methodologi