During the last dozen or so years that I have spent designing or operating faculty evaluation systems around the country, student governments have rarely played a serious role. However, a number of major student-rating systems had their beginnings as student government efforts. The fact that student
Bias and the intended use of student evaluations of university faculty
โ Scribed by Katherine Lewellan Kasten; I. Phillip Young
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 1983
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 509 KB
- Volume
- 12
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-4277
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
This study examines whether the intended use of data obtained from student evaluations of university faculty biases the ratings. The paper reviews and critiques previous research done in the area. Previous studies produced contradictory results, but the results were confounded by several methodological problems. The research reported here remedied some of the problems in previous studies. The findings indicated that, while students are aware of the intended use of ratings as stipulated in written directions, different uses do not result in statistically significant differences in the ratings. Implications for the use of student ratings in the evaluation of faculty are discussed.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
The relationship between student types and students' perceptions and evaluations of the university has been infrequently researched, particularly among the post-activist student generation. Using a random sample of 460 Southern Illinois University-Carbondale (SIU-C) students surveyed in 1973, the re
## Abstract In this paper, we develop an analytical model of joint maximizing behavior on the part of students and professors to develop policy rules for universities who use student evaluations as tools for increasing professor effort and, thereby, student knowledge. More precisely, we examine the
The relationship between faculty publication productivity and the cognitive complexity of student examination questions is examined. Results show that scholars who publish books and those who publish fewer articles ask more critical-thinking questions. Publishing more articles seems to negatively in