๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Bias and the intended use of student evaluations of university faculty

โœ Scribed by Katherine Lewellan Kasten; I. Phillip Young


Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
1983
Tongue
English
Weight
509 KB
Volume
12
Category
Article
ISSN
0020-4277

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This study examines whether the intended use of data obtained from student evaluations of university faculty biases the ratings. The paper reviews and critiques previous research done in the area. Previous studies produced contradictory results, but the results were confounded by several methodological problems. The research reported here remedied some of the problems in previous studies. The findings indicated that, while students are aware of the intended use of ratings as stipulated in written directions, different uses do not result in statistically significant differences in the ratings. Implications for the use of student ratings in the evaluation of faculty are discussed.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The role of student government in facult
โœ Raoul A. Arreola ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1987 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 387 KB

During the last dozen or so years that I have spent designing or operating faculty evaluation systems around the country, student governments have rarely played a serious role. However, a number of major student-rating systems had their beginnings as student government efforts. The fact that student

Student types and the evaluation of the
โœ Samuel Long ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1977 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 910 KB

The relationship between student types and students' perceptions and evaluations of the university has been infrequently researched, particularly among the post-activist student generation. Using a random sample of 460 Southern Illinois University-Carbondale (SIU-C) students surveyed in 1973, the re

An economic analysis of the use of stude
โœ Kiridaran Kanagaretnam; Robert Mathieu; Alex Thevaranjan ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2003 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 192 KB

## Abstract In this paper, we develop an analytical model of joint maximizing behavior on the part of students and professors to develop policy rules for universities who use student evaluations as tools for increasing professor effort and, thereby, student knowledge. More precisely, we examine the

Faculty productivity and the complexity
โœ Robert M. Johnson Jr. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons โš– 457 KB

The relationship between faculty publication productivity and the cognitive complexity of student examination questions is examined. Results show that scholars who publish books and those who publish fewer articles ask more critical-thinking questions. Publishing more articles seems to negatively in