## Abstract Inspection of __Maruzen__ models and force‐field calculations suggest that oligonucleotide analogues integrating backbone and bases (ONIBs) with an aminomethylene linker form similar cyclic duplexes as the analogous oxymethylene linked dinucleosides. The self‐complementary adenosine‐ an
Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbones. Part 26 : Synthesis, Conformational Analysis, and Association of Aminomethylene-Linked Self-Complementary Adenosine and Uridine Dinucleosides with Enforced syn-Conformation
✍ Scribed by Katja Chiesa; Bruno Bernet; Andrea Vasella
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- German
- Weight
- 430 KB
- Volume
- 93
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0018-019X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The self‐complementary aminomethylene‐linked A*[n]U* dinucleosides 23–26 were prepared by reductive coupling of aldehyde 10 and azide 8. The U*[n]A* sequence isomers 19–21 were similarly prepared from aldehyde 14 and azide 3. The substituents at C(6/I) of 23–26 and at C(8/I) of 19–21 strongly favour the syn‐conformation. The A*[n]U* dinucleoside 23 associates more strongly than the sequence‐isomeric U*[n]A* dinucleoside 19. The A*[n]U* dinucleosides 23 and 24 associate more strongly than the analogues devoid of the substituent at C(6/I), while the U*[n]A* dinucleoside 19 associates less strongly than the analogue devoid of the substituent at C(8/I). While 23 and 24 form cyclic duplexes mostly by Watson–Crick‐type base pairing, 25 only forms linear associates. The U*[n]A* dinucleoside 19 forms mostly linear duplexes and higher associates, and 21 forms cyclic duplexes showing both Watson–Crick‐ and Hoogsteen‐type base pairing. The cyclic duplexes of the aminomethylene‐linked dinucleosides show both the gg‐ and gt‐orientation of the linker, with the gg‐orientation being preferred.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The sulfone **2**, and the sulfoxides (__S__)‐**3** and (__R__)‐**3** were obtained by oxidation of the thiomethylene‐linked A\*[s]U dinucleoside **1**. Conformational analysis and association studies of **2**, (__S__)‐**3**, and (__R__)‐**3** reveal a strong influence of the configurat
The formation of cyclic duplexes (pairing) of known oxymethylene-linked self-complementary U\*[o]A ( \* ) dinucleosides contrasts with the absence of pairing of the ethylene-linked U\*[c a ]A ( \* ) analogues. The origin of this difference, and the expected association of U\*[x]A ( \* ) and A\*[x]U