𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Oase group in management buyout

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
43 KB
Volume
2003
Category
Article
ISSN
1359-6128

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Limits on managerial discretion in manag
Limits on managerial discretion in management buyouts: the effectiveness of institutional, market and legal mechanisms
✍ John Easterwood; Anju Seth; Ronald Singer πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 147 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Recent changes in the legal environment faced by US corporations suggest that the shareholder-manager conflict of interest, and the effectiveness of mechanisms to narrow this divergence, are issues of continuing importance. This study examines the linkages between institutional, market and legal mec

Managing Individual Performance in Work
Managing Individual Performance in Work Groups
✍ Robert C. Liden; Sandy J. Wayne; Maria L. Kraimer πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 112 KB

## Abstract This research was driven by the question, β€œIn empowered work groups, who should be responsible for determining disciplinary actions in response to group member poor performance: the formal manager, a single group member, or the group as a whole?” Results in a study of 231 group members

WOMEN AND MINORITY GROUPS IN ENVIRONMENT
WOMEN AND MINORITY GROUPS IN ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
✍ Anoja Wickramasinghe πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 84 KB

The work reported here explores how women and indigenous groups could potentially contribute to the process of environmental management. Women, indigenous communities and the poor are minorities due to their powerlessness. The result is that their opinions are not sought and minorities are not treat

The paradox of self-management: individu
The paradox of self-management: individual and group autonomy in work groups
✍ Claus W. Langfred πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 188 KB πŸ‘ 3 views

This study explores how autonomy at the individual and the group levels directly aect group cohesiveness, and how they indirectly inΒ―uence group eectiveness. Hypotheses suggesting that individual and group autonomy will be oppositely related to cohesiveness are supported in data collected from a lar