Subgroup analyses have specious appeal. They seem logical and intuitive-and even fun-to both investigators and readers. However, this insidious appeal causes important problems. Multiplicity and naivetΓ© combine to encourage interpretational missteps in trial conduct and reporting. The subgroup treat
β¦ LIBER β¦
Multiplicity in randomised trials II: subgroup and interim analyses
β Scribed by Kenneth F Schulz; David A Grimes
- Book ID
- 117289456
- Publisher
- The Lancet
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 185 KB
- Volume
- 365
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0140-6736
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Multiplicity in randomised trials II: su
β
Kenneth F Schulz; David A Grimes
π
Article
π
2005
π
The Lancet
π
English
β 185 KB
Multiplicity in randomised trials I: end
β
Kenneth F Schulz; David A Grimes
π
Article
π
2005
π
The Lancet
π
English
β 239 KB
Inference on Multiple Endpoints in Clini
β
Meinhard Kieser; Peter Bauer; Walter Lehmacher
π
Article
π
1999
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 249 KB
π 2 views
A Comment on Interim Analyses in Crossov
β
Andrew P. Grieve, Stephen Senn and R. J. Cook
π
Article
π
1996
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 713 KB
Interim analyses with delayed observatio
β
Sung C. Choi; Young Jack Lee
π
Article
π
1999
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 95 KB
π 2 views
The interim analyses based on group sequential procedures are not convenient if the response time relative to the patient accrual rate is long. Since in most trials patients are accrued and randomized continuously, the response data from those already randomized will continue to accumulate when a tr
Subgroup analysis in randomised controll
β
Peter M Rothwell
π
Article
π
2005
π
The Lancet
π
English
β 121 KB