The interim analyses based on group sequential procedures are not convenient if the response time relative to the patient accrual rate is long. Since in most trials patients are accrued and randomized continuously, the response data from those already randomized will continue to accumulate when a tr
β¦ LIBER β¦
A Comment on Interim Analyses in Crossover Trials
β Scribed by Andrew P. Grieve, Stephen Senn and R. J. Cook
- Book ID
- 125774680
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 713 KB
- Volume
- 52
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0006-341X
- DOI
- 10.2307/2532866
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Interim analyses with delayed observatio
β
Sung C. Choi; Young Jack Lee
π
Article
π
1999
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 95 KB
π 2 views
Multiplicity in randomised trials II: su
β
Kenneth F Schulz; David A Grimes
π
Article
π
2005
π
The Lancet
π
English
β 185 KB
Multiplicity in randomised trials II: su
β
Kenneth F Schulz; David A Grimes
π
Article
π
2005
π
The Lancet
π
English
β 185 KB
Subgroup analyses have specious appeal. They seem logical and intuitive-and even fun-to both investigators and readers. However, this insidious appeal causes important problems. Multiplicity and naivetΓ© combine to encourage interpretational missteps in trial conduct and reporting. The subgroup treat
Inference on Multiple Endpoints in Clini
β
Meinhard Kieser; Peter Bauer; Walter Lehmacher
π
Article
π
1999
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 249 KB
π 2 views
Predictive checking for Bayesian interim
β
Takashi Daimon
π
Article
π
2008
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 517 KB
Testing superiority at interim analyses
β
Y.H. Joshua Chen; Cong Chen
π
Article
π
2012
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 186 KB