Multi-shot echo-planar Flair imaging of brain tumors: comparison of spin-echo T1-weighted, fast spin-echo T2-weighted, and fast spin-echo Flair imaging
✍ Scribed by Noriaki Tomura; Koki Kato; Satoshi Takahashi; Ryuji Sashi; Jun-ichi Izumi; Komei Narita; Jiro Watarai
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 485 KB
- Volume
- 26
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0895-6111
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Multi-shot echo-planar ¯uid-attenuated inversion-recovery (EPI-Flair) was compared with spin-echo T1-weighted (SE-T1W), fast SE T2weighted (FSE-T2W), and fast Flair (F-Flair) in imaging brain tumors. In 32 patients with various different brain tumors, three reviewers independently evaluated image quality. Two reviewers evaluated the image quality of precontrast EPI-Flair to be signi®cantly better than that of precontrast SE-T1W. Two reviewers evaluated the image quality of postcontrast EPI-Flair as superior to that of postcontrast SE-T1W. Artifacts on postcontrast EPI-Flair were signi®cantly more prominent than those on postcontrast F-Flair.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Purpose To compare the abilities of T2‐weighted (T2W) imaging using respiratory‐triggered fast spin‐echo (RT‐FSE), breathhold fast‐recovery FSE (BH‐FRFSE), and BH single‐shot FSE (BH‐SSFSE) sequences without an endorectal coil to detect rectosigmoid carcinomas. ## Materials and Met
## Abstract To evaluate T2‐weighted fast spin‐echo (FSE) and conventional spin‐echo (CSE) magnetic resonance (MR) techniques in the assessment of brain myelination, 100 consecutive pediatric patients were imaged prospectively with both CSE and FSE sequences. All patients underwent a routine MR exam
## Abstract The purpose of our study was to compare the value of respiratory‐triggered fast spin‐echo, breath‐hold single‐shot fast spin‐echo, and breath‐hold fast‐recovery fast spin‐echo sequences in detecting hepatic lesions. Fat‐suppressed T2‐weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images obtained with
## Abstract Previously published fast spin‐echo (FSE) implementations of a Dixon method for water and fat separation all require multiple scans and thus a relatively long scan time. Further, the minimum echo spacing (esp), a time critical for FSE image quality and scan efficiency, often needs to be