The inside cover picture shows that the wrong hand can fit into a glove in two different ways. Recognizing the incorrect fit requires different mechanisms: 1) fingers mismatched or 2) palm curl incorrect. Similarly, the wrong enantiomer can fit into an enzyme's active site in different ways and requ
Molecular Basis for the Stereoselective Ammoniolysis of N-Alkyl Aziridine-2-Carboxylates Catalyzed by Candida antarctica Lipase B
✍ Scribed by Jae-Hoon Park; Hyun-Joon Ha; Won Koo Lee; Tobie Généreux-Vincent; Romas J. Kazlauskas
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 480 KB
- Volume
- 10
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1439-4227
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Candida antarctica lipase B catalyzed the stereoselective ammoniolysis of N__‐alkyl aziridine‐2‐carboxylates in__ t__BuOH saturated with ammonia and yielded the (2__S__)‐aziridine‐2‐carboxamide and unreacted (2__R__)‐aziridine‐2‐carboxylate. Varying the N‐1 substituent on the aziridine ring changed the rate and stereoselectivity of the reaction. Substrates with a benzyl substituent or a (1′R)‐1‐phenylethyl substituent reacted approximately ten times faster than substrates with a (1′S)‐1‐phenylethyl substituent. Substrates with a benzyl substituent showed little stereoselectivity (E=5–7) while substrates with either a (1′R)‐ or (1′S)‐1‐phenylethyl substituent showed high stereoselectivity (D>50). Molecular modeling by using the current paradigm for enantioselectivity—binding of the slow enantiomer by an exchange‐of‐substituents orientation—could not account for the experimental results. However, modeling an umbrella‐like‐inversion orientation for the slow enantiomer could account for the experimental results. Steric hindrance between the methyl in the (1′S)‐1‐phenylethyl substituent and Thr138 and Ile189 in the acyl‐binding site likely accounts for the slow reaction. Enantioselectivity likely stems from an unfavorable interaction of the methine hydrogen with Thr40 for the slow enantiomer and from subtle differences in the orientations of the other three substituents. This success in rationalizing the enantioselectivity supports the notion that an umbrella‐like‐inversion orientation can contribute to enantioselectivity in lipases.__
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES