Medical clearance for respirator use: Sensitivity and specificity of a questionnaire

✍ Scribed by George P. Pappas; Timothy K. Takaro; Bert Stover; Nancy Beaudet; Mary Salazar; John Calcagni; Douglas Shoop; Scott Barnhart

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 1999
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 165 KB
• Volume: 35
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0271-3586
• DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199904)35:4<395::aid-ajim11>3.0.co;2-q

✦ Synopsis

Background OSHA regulations require that workers receive medical clearance prior to respirator use, and recently, a detailed questionnaire has been provided to assist with this purpose. However, there are limited published data on the sensitivity and specificity of self-administered questionnaires for identifying individuals who may safely wear a respirator. Methods We tested 474 consecutive workers at a Department of Energy complex. After completing the self-administered questionnaire, all workers received a standardized physician evaluation including interview, physical examination, and spirometry. The outcomes of the questionnaire assessment were compared to the outcomes of physician evaluation. Results Data for analysis were available from 413 of workers (87%). All workers received medical clearance; only 10 workers (2.4 %) received work restrictions. The questionnaire demonstrated 100% sensitivity in identifying workers who required work restrictions, but had specificity of only 19%. Compared to physician evaluation, the questionnaire had modest sensitivity to the detection of chronic medical conditions. Conclusions These data suggest that the rates of medical clearance for respirator use are very high, and that a self-administered questionnaire may be appropriate for medical clearance in certain settings. It is recommended that the policy of routine physician evaluation and spirometry for respirator clearance be re-examined.