๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Measurement of urinary total 13C and 13C urea by isotope ratio mass spectrometry after administration of lactose [13C]-Ureide

โœ Scribed by Douglas J. Morrison; Brian Dodson; Tom Preston


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
90 KB
Volume
13
Category
Article
ISSN
0951-4198

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


A method of measuring total 13 C excreted in urine after oral administration of lactose [ 13 C]-ureide was developed using isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Furthermore, a method to measure 13 C urea excreted in the urine was developed. Each urine sample collected over a 24 hour period, after administration of the tracer dose, was analysed for both total 13 C and 13 C urea. Combustion of the dried urine samples allowed measurement of the total 13 C content. Treatment of urine samples with urease (EC 3.5.1.5) and analysis by isotope ratio mass spectrometry of the CO 2 evolved allowed measurement of 13 C urea in the urine sample. The total 13 C and 13 C urea contents of each urine sample, obtained throughout the protocol, were compared to total 13 C and 13 C urea contents of a urine sample taken before the test. This allowed calculation of the fraction of tracer incorporated into urea and the fraction of tracer excreted in total. Analyses showed that approximately 15% of the dose administered, in terms of 13 C, was recovered in the urine over the sampling period. Further analysis for urinary 13 C urea showed that less than 1% of the label was incorporated into urea excreted over the sampling period.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Determination of (13C)urea enrichment by
โœ Michel Beylot; France David; Yadh Khalfallah; Sylvie Normand; Valerie Large; Hen ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1994 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 354 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

We present gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric and gas chromatographic/isotope ratio mass spectrometric assays of the 13C enrichment of plasma urea converted to its dimethylaminomethylene derivative. The limits of sensitivity of the two techniques are 0.2% and 0.02%, respectively. The techniques