𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Liver stiffness identifies two different patterns of fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation

✍ Scribed by José A. Carrión; Ferran Torres; Gonzalo Crespo; Rosa Miquel; Juan-Carlos García-Valdecasas; Miquel Navasa; Xavier Forns


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
611 KB
Volume
51
Category
Article
ISSN
0270-9139

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Significant liver fibrosis (F >or= 2) and portal hypertension (hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] >or= 6 mmHg) at 1 year after liver transplantation (LT) identify patients with severe hepatitis C recurrence. We evaluated whether repeated liver stiffness measurements (LSM) following LT can discriminate between slow and rapid "fibrosers" (fibrosis stage F2-F4 at 1 year after LT). Eighty-four patients who had undergone LT and who were infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and 19 LT controls who were not infected with HCV underwent LSM at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after LT. All HCV-infected patients underwent liver biopsy 12 months after LT (paired HVPG measurements in 74); 31 (37%) were rapid fibrosers. Median LSM (in kilopascal) at months 6, 9, and 12 were significantly higher in rapid fibrosers (9.9, 9.5, 12.1) than in slow fibrosers (6.9, 7.5, 6.6) (P < 0.01 all time points). The slope of liver stiffness progression (kPa x month) in rapid fibrosers (0.42) was significantly greater than in slow fibrosers (0.05) (P < 0.001), suggesting two different speeds of liver fibrosis progression. Figures were almost identical for patients with HVPG >or= 6 mmHg or HVPG < 6 mmHg at 1 year after LT. Multivariate analysis identified donor age, bilirubin level, and LSM as independent predictors of fibrosis progression and portal hypertension in the estimation group (n = 50) and were validated in a second group of 34 patients. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve that could identify rapid fibrosers and patients with portal hypertension as early as 6 months after LT were 0.83 and 0.87, respectively, in the estimation group and 0.75 and 0.80, respectively, in the validation group.

Conclusion:

Early and repeated lsm following hepatitis c recurrence in combination with clinical variables discriminates between rapid and slow fibrosers after lt.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


A prospective evaluation of fibrosis pro
✍ Nevin Yilmaz; Mitchell L. Shiffman; R. Todd Stravitz; Richard K. Sterling; Velim 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 186 KB 👁 2 views

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) following liver transplantation (LT) is universal. A subset of these patients develop advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis and it is believed that this leads to increased posttransplantation mortality. The specific aims of this study were to determine the incidence o

Transcriptome at the time of hepatitis C
✍ Valeria Mas; Daniel Maluf; Kellie J. Archer; Amiee Potter; Jihee Suh; Ricardo Ge 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 443 KB 👁 2 views

Allograft gene expression analysis may provide insights into the mechanisms involved in liver damage during hepatitis C virus recurrence (HCVrec) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and allow the identification of patients who have a higher risk of developing severe disease. Forty-three OLT

Survival and recurrence of hepatitis C a
✍ Jean-Charles Duclos-Vallée; Cyrille Féray; Mylène Sebagh; Elina Teicher; Anne-Ma 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 285 KB 👁 2 views

Liver transplantation in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a recent indication. In a single center, we have compared the survival and severity of recurrent HCV infection after liver transplantation in HIV-HCV-coinfected and HCV-monoinfected pa

The difference in the fibrosis progressi
✍ Nazia Selzner; Nigel Girgrah; Les Lilly; Maha Guindi; Markus Selzner; George The 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 227 KB 👁 1 views

Hepatitis C recurs universally after liver transplantation (LT). Whether its progression differs after live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) is still debated. We retrospectively analyzed 201 consecutive LTs performed at our institution for hepatitis